The U.S. Department of Justice and Donald Trump’s attorneys are vying for different candidates to serve as a special expert to review records the FBI seized from the former president’s Florida estate, both The two sides said Friday, and they disagreed on whether classified records should be excluded from re-examination.
In a joint filing Friday night, the US Justice Department told US District Judge Aileen Cannon that Trump’s legal team is insisting that the employer specifically should be allowed to review “all documents seized, including documents with the classification mark.”
Trump’s lawyers also want the special boss, an independent third party, to review the records for possible requests for executive privilege – a task the department opposes.
Both sides have also suggested two different groups of possible candidates for the job, though they said they plan to notify the court of their position on each other’s shortlists on Monday.
Each side proposes 2 candidates
The Justice Department said it is recommending two candidates for a special master’s position: retired judge Barbara Jones, who previously served as a special master in cases involving two of its former attorneys. Trump, or retired judge Thomas Griffith.
Trump’s team, meanwhile, recommends former judges Raymond Dearie and Paul Huck, the former deputy attorney general of Florida.
The filing comes after Cannon, a Trump appointee in Fort Pierce, Fla., ordered the appointment of a special arbitrator on Monday, agreeing to Trump’s request.
After the Justice Department warned late Thursday that doing so could slow the government’s efforts to determine whether classified documents were still missing, Cannon said in a court filing. case, she is willing to consider limiting the role of the special owner so that he or she does not review confidential documents.
Trump is under investigation for government record keeping, some of which have been marked as top secret, at his Palm Beach home after leaving office in January 2021. The government is also investigating the possibility. potential obstruction of the investigation.