Flooded with AI-generated images, some art communities ban them altogether

A kind of robot image produced by Steady Diffusion
Enlarge / A sort of robot portrait created by Diffuse Stabilization as found on the Lexica search engine.

Faced with an overwhelming amount of artificial intelligence-generated art, some online art communities have taken drastic steps to ban or limit its presence on websites. theirs, including New wallpapers, Inkblot Artand Fur hobbyaccording to Andy Baio’s

Baio who followed Ethical Art AI on my blog, first noticed the bans and reported them on Friday. So far, the major art communities DeviantArt and ArtStation have not made any policy changes related to AI, but some vocal artist on social media complained about the level of AI art they regularly see on those platforms.

The emergence of widely available image compositing models such as Midjourney and Stable diffusion has sparked a furious online battle between artists who consider AI-powered artwork a form of plagiarism (more info below) and enthusiastic artists hug New creative tools.

Established artist communities are at a rough crossroads because they fear non-AI artworks will be dwarfed by the unlimited supply of AI-generated art, however, tools. This also became remarkably popular among some of their members.

Prohibition of art created through image compositing in its Art Portal, Newgrounds Written“We wanted to focus on people-generated art and not let the Art Portal flood with computer-generated art.”

Fur Affinity cited ethical concerns about how image fusion models learn from existing artwork, write“Our goal is to support artists and their content. We do not believe that allowing AI-generated content on the site is in the best interest of the community.”

These are just the latest moves in a rapidly evolving debate about how art communities (and art professionals) can adapt software capable of creating works of art. boundless beauty with a speed no man can do without tools that can match.

Part of a broader art-ethic debate

A series of non-AI artworks used to train Stable Diffusion, assembled by
Enlarge / A series of non-AI artworks used to train Stable Diffusion, assembled by

The current wave of image compositing tools allow users to enter a text description (called a “prompt”) and output a matching, almost magical image. The results often require care and meticulous cherries picking to achieve just the right amount, but with skillful prompting, the results can mimic the works of human artists with double detail. when gorgeous.

The most successful prompts often refer to existing artists and art sites by name but rarely singly. Mixing artists can create innovative new style blends. For example, here’s the prompt that created the robotic woman in the center of the image at the top of this article in Steady Diffusion:

Beautiful cry! female android machine!, half portrait, Intricately detailed environment, reality!, complex, elegant, very detail, digital painting, art district, concept art, smooth, strong focus, illustration, art by artgerm and greg rutkowski and alphonse mucha (Seed 79409566)

The most commonly used image composite models latent diffusion technique to create novel artwork by analyzing millions of images without the consent of the artist or the copyright owner. In the case of Steady Diffusion, those images are sourced directly from the Internet, thanks to the LAION-5B database. (Images found on the Internet often have a description attached, which is ideal to train AI models.)

Recently, Baio and AI researcher Simon Willison took the data of more than 12 million images in LAION-5B and created a search allows the user to see through a small but representative part of a much larger set. (You can also search for the LAION5B image set for artwork—or even your own name—in a demo hosted on Github.)

Searching for Jeremy Lipking, a living fine art artist, yields results in the LAION dataset.
Enlarge / Searching for Jeremy Lipking, a living fine art artist, yields results in the LAION dataset.

Ars Technica

A few weeks ago, a number of artists started exploring their artwork in the Stable Diffuse dataset, and they not happy about it. Charlie Warzel wrote a detailed report about these reactions to The Atlantic last week. With the line drawn firmly in the sand and new AI creation tool is taking place on a regular basis, this debate is likely to continue for some time to come.

Source link


News5s: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button