Center said Maharashtra Anti-Corruption Bureau did not have sanctions to probe ED officials in extortion case

According to the Center, the Maharashtra Anti-Corruption Bureau did not impose sanctions for investigating ED officials in an extortion case.

Representative image (Photo: India Today)

Complementary Attorney General Anil Singh on Wednesday informed the court that the Maharashtra Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) had not taken any sanctions from the central government under section 17A of the Anti-Corruption Act. corruption, which is necessary in case of registration against businessman Jitendra Navlani .

The lawsuit against Navlani names him and others. Singh noted that politicians in Maharashtra regularly make statements alleging that ED officials are involved in blackmail and will be jailed. Section 17A of the act provides that no investigation, inquiry or investigation may take place without the prior approval of the appropriate authority. Therefore, if a central authority official is charged in this case, prior authorization from the central government is required.

Singh stressed before the bench that the ACB FIR was only filed to derail the ongoing investigation into various politicians in the state, which is at a critical stage.

The beggar of the government asked for more time in front of the benches of Judges Milind Jadhav and Abhay Ahuja. The bench then gave the ACB two weeks to submit a response before giving the Coalition government another week to file a return request. The court announced that ED’s plea would be heard again in three weeks.

The ACB has filed a lawsuit against businessman Jitendra Navlanialleged that he extorted about Rs 58,96,46,108 from various private companies between 2015 and 2021 by posing as a liaison for ED officials.

Shiv Sena Congressman Sanjay Raut claimed in March that ED officials were involved in an extortion case in the state. He also claimed that ED and Navlani officers extorted more than Rs 100 crore from builders and corporate offices. Raut and Navlani also wrote to the Prime Minister about the involvement of ED officials.

The ED’s defense stated that “ED officers, although they were not named, were charged in the FIR, from a number of public statements and tweets by senior Shiv Sena leaders, including Sanjay Raut, it is clear that the State Police investigation has been started with a clear intention and will not be biased or objective.Instead, the entire act of registering a criminal case is clearly there. motive to derail a statutory investigation and to keep ED officers from being threatened with malicious and angry criminal prosecution and to prevent them from exercising their lawful statutory powers to unearthed the money laundering of some highly powerful and politically connected people in Maharashtra.”

The ED wants the investigation of the FIR filed by the ACB on May 5 referred to any “objective investigative body such as the CBI to ensure an objective and objective investigation into the existence of any any offense and preserve all subsequent actions seeking to commence under the reluctant FIR.”

Source link


News5s: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Check Also
Back to top button